Recruit for applied AI evidence, not an impressive list of tools

Jobs & Talent · Source published 21 May 2024

Multinational engineering team examining advanced materials

Research signal

PwC’s 2024 AI Jobs Barometer linked AI exposure with changing skill requirements and wage premiums in analysed job markets. These are market associations, not a guaranteed pay rise for an individual.

Source: PwC — 2024 Global AI Jobs Barometer · 21 May 2024.

Event Systematic perspective

A vacancy that asks for ‘AI expertise’ without describing the work invites inconsistent applications. A better brief explains the output: reconcile two sources, prepare a reviewed analysis or build a controlled workflow. Candidates can then show evidence that is relevant to the role, and recruiters can compare like with like.

For a consultant or analyst appointment, use a short synthetic case. Give every candidate the same incomplete information and allow clearly disclosed AI assistance. Ask them to identify uncertainties and explain their final judgement. The important evidence is how they verify, prioritise and communicate, including when they decide not to use generated material.

Put it into practice

  • Separate essential domain knowledge from skills that can be developed after joining.
  • Publish the assessment criteria in advance and provide an accessible alternative where needed.
  • Retain a concise record of the human selection rationale; do not let polished AI-written applications substitute for demonstrated ability.

Explore employer services, career development and the AI Academy. Discuss your workforce priorities with Event Systematic →

Back to The Workforce Brief and monthly archive →