AI exposure is not a forecast of job losses

Jobs & Talent · Source published 20 May 2025

a multinational professional team working with a humanoid robot

Research signal

The ILO’s May 2025 refined global index measured occupational exposure to generative AI. Exposure describes potential task effects, not observed job losses.

Source: ILO — Generative AI and Jobs: A Refined Global Index · 20 May 2025.

Event Systematic perspective

This distinction matters in workforce communication. An occupation can contain tasks that are easy to automate alongside tasks that require context, relationships or physical presence. A high-level exposure score cannot determine an individual employee’s future or replace a company-specific assessment.

HR teams should break a role into recurring activities and examine how each might change. Some activities may become faster; others may require more verification; new responsibilities may appear. Discuss the resulting options with the people doing the work before presenting a headcount conclusion. The purpose is to understand the redesign choices available.

Put it into practice

  • Use exposure research as a starting question, not a redundancy list.
  • Assess quality, demand, supervision and implementation constraints at task level.
  • Communicate the difference between a scenario, a trial result and an approved organisational decision.

Explore employer services, career development and the AI Academy. Discuss your workforce priorities with Event Systematic →

Back to The Workforce Brief and monthly archive →